BFNL sequence learning

 

 

 

 

  METLAB BiopsyToolbox

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

News

27.06.2016

Vortragsankündigung

BioPsy-Colloquium, 1 - 3 pm ct, GAFO 05/425
E. Pascal Malkemper (Dept. of General Zoology, University Duisburg-Essen): Studying magnetoreception in mammals

24.06.2016

Stellenausschreibung

Studentische Hilfskraft für die Taubenpflege (7 Std./Woche) ab dem 01.08. 2016 gesucht. mehr

Contact

Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Fakultät für Psychologie
AE Biopsychologie
GAFO 05/618
D-44780 Bochum

Phone: +49 234 - 32 28213
Fax: +49 234 - 32 14377

Email: biopsychologie@rub.de
Homepage: http://www.bio.psy.rub.de


News & Views

A three-dimensional digital atlas of the starling brain

Because of their sophisticated vocal behaviour, their social nature, their high plasticity and their robustness, starlings have become an important model species that is widely used in studies of neuroethology of song production and perception. Since magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents an increasingly relevant tool for
comparative neuroscience, a 3D MRI-based atlas of the starling brain becomes essential. Using multiple imaging protocols, scientists from the University of Antwerp in Belgium, Université Rennes in France, and from the Biopsychology Department of the RUB delineated several sensory systems as well as the song control system. This starling brain atlas can easily be used to determine the stereotactic location of identified neural structures at any angle of the head. Additionally, the atlas is useful to find the optimal angle of sectioning for slice experiments, stereotactic injections and electrophysiological recordings. The starling brain atlas is freely available for the scientific community.

 

De Groof, G., George, I., Touj, S., Stacho, M., Jonckers, E., Cousillas, H., Hausberger, M., Güntürkün, O., Van der Linden, Annemie, A three-dimensional digital atlas of the starling brain, 2016, Brain Structure and Function, 221, 1899-1909.

 

News & Views

Farewell to Sarah Starosta

Unbelievable but true: Sarah Starosta has left the lab for a postdoc stay in New York. Sarah was an indispensable part of the Biopsychology since time being. It is very, very sad to part, but the lab of Adam Kepecs in New York is a great place to be and Sarah will certainly make the next big academic leap there. Leaving Bochum to whatever place is always sort of descend. But leaving for New York is certainly among the more acceptable options.
Hey Sarah: We will miss you a lot!!!!

 

News & Views

Motivational control of sign-tracking behaviour

Learning and motivation are two psychological processes allowing animals to form and express Pavlovian associations between a conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (UCS). However, most models have attempted to capture the mechanisms of learning while neglecting the role that motivation (or incentive salience) may actively play in the expression of behaviour. There is now a body of neurobehavioural evidence showing that incentive salience represents a major determinant of Pavlovian performance. This article presents a motivational model of sign-tracking behaviour whose aim is to explain a wide range of behavioural effects, including those related to partial reinforcement, physiological changes, competition between CSs, and individual differences in responding to a CS. In this model, associative learning is assumed to determine the ability to produce a Pavlovian conditioned response rather than to control the strength and the quality of that response. The model is in keeping with the incentive salience hypothesis and will therefore be discussed in the context of dopamine’s role in the brain.

 

Anselme, P., Motivational control of sign-tracking behaviour: A theoretical framework, 2016, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 65: 1-20.

 

News & Views

A GABAergic Tecto–Tegmento–Tectal Pathway in Pigeons

Previous studies have demonstrated that the optic tecta of the left and right brain halves reciprocally inhibit each other in birds. In mammals, the superior colliculus receives inhibitory γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic input from the basal ganglia via both the ipsilateral and the contralateral substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr). This contralateral SNr projection is important in intertectal inhibition. Because the basal ganglia are evolutionarily conserved, the tectal projections of the SNr may show a similar pattern in birds. Therefore, the SNr could be a relay station in an indirect tecto–tectal pathway constituting the neuronal substrate for the tecto–tectal inhibition. To test this hypothesis, neuroscientists from the Biopsychology performed bilateral anterograde and retrograde tectal tracing combined with GABA immunohistochemistry in pigeons. Suprisingly, they found out that the SNr has only ipsilateral projections to the optic tectum, and these are non-GABAergic. Inhibitory GABAergic input to the contralateral optic tectum arises instead from a nearby tegmental region that receives input from the ipsilateral optic tectum. Thus, a disynaptic pathway exists that possibly constitutes the anatomical substrate for the inhibitory tecto–tectal interaction. This pathway likely plays an important role in attentional switches between the laterally placed eyes of birds.

 

Stacho, M., Letzner, S., Theiss, C., Manns, M., Güntürkün, O., A GABAergic Tecto-Tegmento-Tectal Pathway in Pigeons, The Journal of Comparative Neurologyia, 2016, DOI 10.1002/cne.23999.

 

News & Views

Cognition without cortex

In this issue of Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Onur Güntürkün and Thomas Bugnyar discuss how the brains of birds and mammals evolved in parallel for about 300 million years to achieve comparable cognitive abilities despite quite different neural architectures, most notably the lack of an avian cortex. They present anatomical and functional evidence that the avian pallium serves the functional role of the layered mammalian cortex. Finally, they discuss how the commonalities between avian and mammalian circuits may reveal the necessary ingredients to support intelligent behavior.

 

 

Güntürkün, O. and Bugnyar, T., Cognition without cortex, Trends in Cognitive Science, 2016, 20: 291-303.

 

 

News & Views Archive

See older News & Views